Nigeria, Others To See Fall In Income Per Head, IMF Warns | Independent Newspapers Limited
Newsletter subscribe


Nigeria, Others To See Fall In Income Per Head, IMF Warns

IMF, skilled workers
Posted: Jul 22, 2016 at 6:05 am   /   by   /   comments (0)

Income per head in Nigeria and other sub-Saharan African countries will fall this year for the first time since 1994, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), reports FT.

The fund has downgraded its forecast for gross domestic product growth in sub-Saharan Africa from the 3 percent it foresaw in April to just 1.6 percent, well below expectations of population growth of 2.5 percent.

The sharp slowdown will entrench poverty in a region where annual per capita GDP in purchasing power parity terms is just $3,869.

“This [fall in per capita GDP] is very bad news. It’s something that people really haven’t paid enough attention to in Africa,” said John Ashbourne, Africa economist at Capital Economics.

“Even when you had growth of 5 percent, with population growth of 2.8 percent you were losing half of that. Things were never getting better at the rate people thought. Now things will be getting worse for the median person in Africa.”

Yvonne Mhango, sub-Saharan economist at Renaissance Capital, added: “We need to be growing at around 6 to 7 percent in order to make inroads into poverty reduction in sub-Saharan Africa.

“The region will regress for two to three years at least. This will delay the achievement of some of the development goals that have been set.”

Africans are also set to fall even further behind the rest of the world in relative terms, further undermining the increasingly tarnished concept of “Africa rising”.

If the IMF’s revised numbers prove correct, GDP growth in sub-Saharan Africa will not only be the weakest since 1992, but will undershoot global growth for the first time since 2000.

This trend is likely to be repeated in 2017, with the IMF having downgraded its forecast for sub-Saharan GDP growth from 4 percent to 3.3 percent for next year, below the 3.4 percent it has pencilled in for the world at large.

The IMF’s sharp downward revision for 2016 is driven by the woes of the sub-Saharan region’s two largest economies, Nigeria and South Africa.

Although the fund trimmed its forecast for global growth to 3.1 percent this year, this still represents meaningful real gains, given population growth of around 1.2 percent.

The Washington-based body believes the Nigerian economy will contract by 1.8 percent this year, rather than expanding by 2.3 percent, as foreseen in April.

Africa’s most populous nation has been roiled by weak oil prices, attacks on oil installations in the south of the country and the predations of Boko Haram extremists in the north, as well as the self-inflicted pain of an abortive attempt to prop up the naira that led to a severe foreign currency shortage.

South Africa, where the IMF now sees growth of just 0.1 percent this year, rather than 0.6 percent, has suffered a litany of woes ranging from low commodity prices, power shortages and poor job creation to severe drought and weak consumer confidence due to political uncertainty.

The IMF’s forecasts for these two heavyweights, which between them account for 54 percent of sub-Saharan GDP, are now below those of many commercial organisations, particularly Standard Chartered.

The London-based bank still sees growth of 0.6 percent in South Africa and 1.6 percent in Nigeria this year, despite both countries reporting a year-on-year contraction in the first quarter of 2016.

Razia Khan, chief Africa economist at StanChart, argued that with the oil sector now less than 10 percent of the Nigerian economy, the abandonment of the naira’s damaging dollar peg and an expansionary budget, growth should return in the remainder of this year.

Ms Mhango also predicted growth in Nigeria in the second half of the year, thanks to the belated unveiling of economic reforms, although the situation was likely “to be challenging for some years”.

Across the sub-Saharan region as a whole, Mr Ashbourne argued “there are two things happening. Trend growth in most cases has come down because of lower commodity prices and that has coincided with big problems in the three largest economies”, with Angola, the region’s third-largest economy, “also having a disastrous year”, thanks to rising unemployment and inflation topping 30 percent.

However, there is a view that the IMF’s glum regional forecast is largely driven by the problems of the largest economies, rather than being symptomatic of the 49 countries of sub-Saharan Africa as a whole.

Mr Ashbourne singled out the success of east Africa, where he believed growth is accelerating in Kenya and is likely to hit 5-6 percent this year in Ethiopia.

Ms Khan also pointed to Ivory Coast, where “strong investment and private consumption” (allied to the benefits of a “reasonably consistent electricity supply”, something that would go without saying in many other parts of the world) should generate growth of around 8 percent this year.

Elsewhere in West Africa, Senegal is likely to chalk up its strongest growth for 13 years, of 6.5 percent, said Ms Khan, who argued that the IMF’s overall forecast “doesn’t tell the whole African story by any stretch”.

Despite this, Mr Ashbourne, who estimated regional growth would recover somewhat to 3 percent in 2017, said “the bounceback that will happen next year will not take growth back to what is considered normal”.

“Even if things get better next year, it will still be what was thought very bad a few years ago,” he added.